| Title |
National Survey of Fluid Therapy in Acute Pancreatitis: Current Practice Lacks a Sound Evidence Base
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Surgery, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00268-013-2105-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew D. Haydock, Anubhav Mittal, Marc van den Heever, Jeremy I. Rossaak, Saxon Connor, Michael Rodgers, Maxim S. Petrov, John A. Windsor, Pancreas Network of New Zealand |
| Abstract |
Fluid therapy (FT) is a critical intervention in managing acute pancreatitis (AP). There is a paucity of evidence to guide FT and virtually no data on current prescribing practice. This survey aims to characterize current practice and opinion with regard to FT in AP throughout New Zealand. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 36% |
| Unknown | 5 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 59% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 7 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2018.
All research outputs
#3,768,380
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#588
of 4,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,777
of 195,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#2
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.