↓ Skip to main content

Nutrient processes at the stream‐lake interface for a channelized versus unmodified stream mouth

Overview of attention for article published in Water Resources Research, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nutrient processes at the stream‐lake interface for a channelized versus unmodified stream mouth
Published in
Water Resources Research, January 2017
DOI 10.1002/2016wr019538
Authors

Richard Niswonger, Ramon Naranjo, David Smith, Jim Constantz, Kip Allander, Donald Rosenberry, Bethany Neilson, Michael R. Rosen, David Stonestrom

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 39%
Student > Master 3 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Unknown 4 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 22%
Environmental Science 2 11%
Engineering 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2017.
All research outputs
#16,079,592
of 24,464,848 outputs
Outputs from Water Resources Research
#3,878
of 5,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,002
of 430,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water Resources Research
#29
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,464,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.