↓ Skip to main content

A history of random processes

Overview of attention for article published in Archive for History of Exact Sciences, January 1968
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
A history of random processes
Published in
Archive for History of Exact Sciences, January 1968
DOI 10.1007/bf00328110
Authors

Stephen G. Brush

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 33%
Student > Master 2 17%
Professor 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 17%
Chemistry 2 17%
Chemical Engineering 1 8%
Computer Science 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 3 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2020.
All research outputs
#6,996,768
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Archive for History of Exact Sciences
#52
of 315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,245
of 13,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archive for History of Exact Sciences
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 315 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them