↓ Skip to main content

Duration and Timing of Exposure to Neighborhood Poverty and the Risk of Adolescent Parenthood

Overview of attention for article published in Demography, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
Title
Duration and Timing of Exposure to Neighborhood Poverty and the Risk of Adolescent Parenthood
Published in
Demography, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/s13524-013-0219-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geoffrey T. Wodtke

Abstract

Theory suggests that the impact of neighborhood poverty depends on both the duration and timing of exposure. Previous research, however, has not properly analyzed the sequence of neighborhoods to which children are exposed throughout the early life course. This study investigates the effects of different longitudinal patterns of exposure to disadvantaged neighborhoods on the risk of adolescent parenthood. It follows a cohort of children in the PSID from age 4 to 19 and uses novel methods for time-varying exposures that overcome critical limitations of conventional regression when selection processes are dynamic. Results indicate that sustained exposure to poor neighborhoods substantially increases the risk of becoming a teen parent and that exposure to neighborhood poverty during adolescence may be more consequential than exposure earlier during childhood.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
India 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Unknown 112 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 29%
Student > Master 16 14%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 19 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 57 48%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 8%
Psychology 10 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 22 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2023.
All research outputs
#738,913
of 25,192,722 outputs
Outputs from Demography
#205
of 2,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,260
of 200,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Demography
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,192,722 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,032 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.