| Title |
Mechanical Bowel Preparation Does Not Affect Clinical Severity of Anastomotic Leakage in Rectal Cancer Surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Surgery, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00268-016-3839-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Woong Bae Ji, Koo Yong Hahn, Jung Myun Kwak, Dong Woo Kang, Jin Baek, Jin Kim, Seon Hahn Kim |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 7 | 18% |
| United States | 7 | 18% |
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| Panama | 1 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 3% |
| Poland | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 53% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 28% |
| Scientists | 6 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 18% |
| Researcher | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 11 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 50% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 14 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2017.
All research outputs
#1,642,162
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#165
of 4,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,491
of 429,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#4
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.