↓ Skip to main content

Validity of the 30-15 Intermittent Fitness Test in Subelite Female Athletes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validity of the 30-15 Intermittent Fitness Test in Subelite Female Athletes
Published in
Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, November 2017
DOI 10.1519/jsc.0000000000001775
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lyndell M. Bruce, Simon J. Moule

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to assess the suitability of the 30-15 IFT as a test in netball using female athletes. 26 female sub-elite netballers (mean age = 19.7 ± 4.6 years, mean height = 176.0 ± 6.1 cm, mean body mass = 69.7 ± 9.3 kg) completed the yo-yo intermittent recovery test level 1 (yo-yo IRT1) and the 30-15 Intermittent Fitness Test (30-15 IFT). Participants performed both assessments one week apart prior to the intervention and both tests one week apart following the training intervention (for a total of four testing sessions). A six-week training intervention occurred between the test occasions. Pearson's correlations revealed significant very large relationships between the 30-15 IFT and yo-yo IRT on both test occasions (test occasion 1: r = 0.71, p = 0.003 (95% CI 0.35 - 0.89), magnitude of effect, most likely; test occasion 2: r = 0.72, p = 0.001 (95% CI 0.42 - 0.88), magnitude of effect, most likely). Repeated measures ANOVAs examining the effect of position on performance changes revealed main effects for test occasion and a position x test occasion interaction for both the 30-15 IFT and the yo-yo IRT1 (30-15 IFT: test occasion (F(1,14) = 28.68, p = 0.001, ηp = .67), position x test occasion interaction (F(2,14) = 9.38, p = 0.003, ηp = .57; yo-yo IRT1: test occasion (F(1,15) = 11.72, p = 0.004, ηp = .44), position x test occasion interaction (F(2,15) = 9.96, p = 0.002, ηp = .57). Results show that the 30-15 IFT is a suitable test for female netballers as it was able to detect improvements in performance after a training intervention, in addition to having a very large significant relationship with the yo-yo IRT1.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Lecturer 4 7%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 21 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 28 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Unspecified 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 24 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2018.
All research outputs
#14,386,613
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
#4,670
of 6,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,726
of 340,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
#70
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.