↓ Skip to main content

The Path from the RNA World

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Evolution, January 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 1,477)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
228 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
Title
The Path from the RNA World
Published in
Journal of Molecular Evolution, January 1998
DOI 10.1007/pl00006275
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony M. Poole, Daniel C. Jeffares, David Penny

Abstract

We describe a sequential (step by step) Darwinian model for the evolution of life from the late stages of the RNA world through to the emergence of eukaryotes and prokaryotes. The starting point is our model, derived from current RNA activity, of the RNA world just prior to the advent of genetically-encoded protein synthesis. By focusing on the function of the protoribosome we develop a plausible model for the evolution of a protein-synthesizing ribosome from a high-fidelity RNA polymerase that incorporated triplets of oligonucleotides. With the standard assumption that during the evolution of enzymatic activity, catalysis is transferred from RNA --> RNP --> protein, the first proteins in the "breakthrough organism" (the first to have encoded protein synthesis) would be nonspecific chaperone-like proteins rather than catalytic. Moreover, because some RNA molecules that pre-date protein synthesis under this model now occur as introns in some of the very earliest proteins, the model predicts these particular introns are older than the exons surrounding them, the "introns-first" theory. Many features of the model for the genome organization in the final RNA world ribo-organism are more prevalent in the eukaryotic genome and we suggest that the prokaryotic genome organization (a single, circular genome with one center of replication) was derived from a "eukaryotic-like" genome organization (a fragmented linear genome with multiple centers of replication). The steps from the proposed ribo-organism RNA genome --> eukaryotic-like DNA genome --> prokaryotic-like DNA genome are all relatively straightforward, whereas the transition prokaryotic-like genome --> eukaryotic-like genome appears impossible under a Darwinian mechanism of evolution, given the assumption of the transition RNA --> RNP --> protein. A likely molecular mechanism, "plasmid transfer," is available for the origin of prokaryotic-type genomes from an eukaryotic-like architecture. Under this model prokaryotes are considered specialized and derived with reduced dependence on ssRNA biochemistry. A functional explanation is that prokaryote ancestors underwent selection for thermophily (high temperature) and/or for rapid reproduction (r selection) at least once in their history.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Germany 4 2%
Brazil 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Mexico 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 189 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 14%
Student > Master 21 10%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Professor 19 9%
Other 45 21%
Unknown 27 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 102 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 17%
Chemistry 10 5%
Environmental Science 7 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 2%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 31 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,250,964
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#28
of 1,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#863
of 94,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.