↓ Skip to main content

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Genomics: Update for Clinicians

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Genomics: Update for Clinicians
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11920-012-0309-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Josephine Elia, Jillan Sackett, Terri Turner, Martin Schardt, Shih-Ching Tang, Nicole Kurtz, Maura Dunfey, Nadia A. McFarlane, Aita Susi, David Danish, Alice Li, Jenelle Nissley-Tsiopinis, Karin Borgmann-Winter

Abstract

Attention deficit, hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is familial and highly heritable. Several candidate genes involved in neurotransmission have been identified, however these confer minimal risk, suggesting that for the most part, ADHD is not caused by single common genetic variants. Advances in genotyping enabling investigation at the level of the genome have led to the discovery of rare structural variants suggesting that ADHD is a genomic disorder, with potentially thousands of variants, and common neuronal pathways disrupted by numerous rare variants resulting in similar ADHD phenotypes. Heritability studies in humans also indicate the importance of epigenetic factors, and animal studies are deciphering some of the processes that confer risk during gestation and throughout the post-natal period. These and future discoveries will lead to improved diagnosis, individualized treatment, cures, and prevention. These advances also highlight ethical and legal issues requiring management and interpretation of genetic data and ensuring privacy and protection from misuse.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Spain 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 70 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Master 13 17%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Other 5 7%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 18 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2013.
All research outputs
#18,339,860
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#1,039
of 1,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,754
of 164,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#15
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.