↓ Skip to main content

Addressing the Problem of Stagnant Wages

Overview of attention for article published in Comparative Economic Studies, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 283)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Addressing the Problem of Stagnant Wages
Published in
Comparative Economic Studies, August 2012
DOI 10.1057/ces.2012.28
Authors

Frank Levy, Thomas Kochan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 45%
Other 3 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 30%
Social Sciences 6 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Environmental Science 2 10%
Psychology 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2016.
All research outputs
#2,037,957
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Comparative Economic Studies
#13
of 283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,585
of 151,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Comparative Economic Studies
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them