| Title |
Introduction to polymer-based solid-contact ion-selective electrodes—basic concepts, practical considerations, and current research topics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00216-016-9945-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christoph Bieg, Kai Fuchsberger, Martin Stelzle |
| Abstract |
This review aims at providing an introductory overview for researchers new to the field of ion-selective electrodes. Both state of the art technology and novel developments towards solid-contact reference (sc-RE) and solid-contact ion selective electrodes (sc-ISE) are discussed. This technology has potentially widespread and important applications provided certain performance criteria can be met. We present basic concepts, operation principles, and theoretical considerations with regard to their function. Analytical performance and suitability of sc-RE and sc-ISE for a given application depend on critical parameters, which are discussed in this review. Comprehensive evaluation of sensor performance along this set of parameters is considered indispensable to allow for a well-founded comparison of different technologies. Methods and materials employed in the construction of sc-RE and sc-ISE, in particular the solid contact and the polymer membrane composite, are presented and discussed in detail. Operation principles beyond potentiometry are mentioned, which would further extend the field of ISE application. Finally, we conclude by directing the reader to important areas for further scientific research and development work considered particularly critical and promising for advancing this field in sensor R&D. Graphical Abstract ᅟ. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 145 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 26% |
| Researcher | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 40 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 46 | 32% |
| Materials Science | 13 | 9% |
| Engineering | 13 | 9% |
| Chemical Engineering | 7 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 48 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2020.
All research outputs
#8,262,107
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#1,975
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,617
of 332,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#28
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.