| Title |
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: results of an international guideline-based performance improvement program targeting severe sepsis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-009-1738-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mitchell M. Levy, R. Phillip Dellinger, Sean R. Townsend, Walter T. Linde-Zwirble, John C. Marshall, Julian Bion, Christa Schorr, Antonio Artigas, Graham Ramsay, Richard Beale, Margaret M. Parker, Herwig Gerlach, Konrad Reinhart, Eliezer Silva, Maurene Harvey, Susan Regan, Derek C. Angus |
| Abstract |
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC or "the Campaign") developed guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. A performance improvement initiative targeted changing clinical behavior (process improvement) via bundles based on key SSC guideline recommendations on process improvement and patient outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 67% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 760 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 14 | 2% |
| Unknown | 715 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 108 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 97 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 78 | 10% |
| Other | 76 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 73 | 10% |
| Other | 225 | 30% |
| Unknown | 103 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 449 | 59% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 43 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 2% |
| Other | 82 | 11% |
| Unknown | 118 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,048,812
of 25,335,657 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#986
of 5,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,083
of 177,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,335,657 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.