↓ Skip to main content

T-cell Receptor Specificity Maintained by Altered Thermodynamics*

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biological Chemistry, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
T-cell Receptor Specificity Maintained by Altered Thermodynamics*
Published in
Journal of Biological Chemistry, May 2013
DOI 10.1074/jbc.m113.464560
Pubmed ID
Authors

Florian Madura, Pierre J. Rizkallah, Kim M. Miles, Christopher J. Holland, Anna M. Bulek, Anna Fuller, Andrea J.A. Schauenburg, John J. Miles, Nathaniel Liddy, Malkit Sami, Yi Li, Moushumi Hossain, Brian M. Baker, Bent K. Jakobsen, Andrew K. Sewell, David K. Cole

Abstract

The T-cell receptor (TCR) recognizes peptides bound to major histocompatibility molecules (MHC) and allows T-cells to interrogate the cellular proteome for internal anomalies from the cell surface. The TCR contacts both MHC and peptide in an interaction characterized by weak affinity (KD = 100 nM to 270 μM). We used phage-display to produce a melanoma-specific TCR (α24β17) with a 30,000-fold enhanced binding affinity (KD = 0.6 nM) to aid our exploration of the molecular mechanisms utilized to maintain peptide specificity. Remarkably, although the enhanced affinity was mediated primarily through new TCR-MHC contacts, α24β17 remained acutely sensitive to modifications at every position along the peptide backbone, mimicking the specificity of the wild type TCR. Thermodynamic analyses revealed an important role for solvation in directing peptide specificity. These findings advance our understanding of the molecular mechanisms that can govern the exquisite peptide specificity characteristic of TCR recognition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Sweden 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 73 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 30%
Researcher 19 24%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Student > Master 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 9%
Chemistry 6 8%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 10 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,582,837
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biological Chemistry
#11,960
of 85,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,416
of 208,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biological Chemistry
#75
of 609 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 85,238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 609 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.