| Title |
Visual anatomical lung CT scan assessment of lung recruitability
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-012-2707-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Davide Chiumello, Antonella Marino, Matteo Brioni, Federica Menga, Irene Cigada, Marco Lazzerini, Maria C. Andrisani, Pietro Biondetti, Bruno Cesana, Luciano Gattinoni |
| Abstract |
The computation of lung recruitability in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is advocated to set positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) for preventing lung collapse. The quantitative lung CT scan, obtained by manual image processing, is the reference method but it is time consuming. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a visual anatomical analysis compared with a quantitative lung CT scan analysis in assessing lung recruitability. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 69 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 20% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 20% |
| Unknown | 12 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 68% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Psychology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2013.
All research outputs
#18,339,860
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#4,418
of 4,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,627
of 170,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#33
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,970 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.