↓ Skip to main content

Flat-panel detectors: how much better are they?

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Radiology, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Flat-panel detectors: how much better are they?
Published in
Pediatric Radiology, July 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00247-006-0208-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Anthony Seibert

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 197 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 18%
Student > Master 32 16%
Student > Bachelor 28 14%
Researcher 25 12%
Other 12 6%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 43 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 51 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 18%
Engineering 23 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Materials Science 8 4%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 52 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,503,741
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Radiology
#650
of 2,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,883
of 65,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Radiology
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,090 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.