Title |
A critical review of elaboration theory
|
---|---|
Published in |
Educational technology research and development, September 1992
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf02296843 |
Authors |
Brent Wilson, Peggy Cole |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 6% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Sweden | 1 | 2% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 47 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 13% |
Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
Researcher | 4 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
Other | 14 | 26% |
Unknown | 10 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 15 | 28% |
Psychology | 4 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 6% |
Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 17% |
Unknown | 16 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2017.
All research outputs
#3,505,282
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Educational technology research and development
#103
of 1,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,112
of 19,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational technology research and development
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,048 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 19,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them