↓ Skip to main content

Factors associated with occupancy of pharmacist positions in public sector hospitals in Uganda: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resources for Health, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
Factors associated with occupancy of pharmacist positions in public sector hospitals in Uganda: a cross-sectional study
Published in
Human Resources for Health, January 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12960-016-0176-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Ocwa Obua, Richard Odoi Adome, Paul Kutyabami, Freddy Eric Kitutu, Pakoyo Fadhiru Kamba

Abstract

Pharmacists are invaluable resources in health care. Their expertise in pharmacotherapy and medicine management both ensures that medicines of appropriate quality are available in health facilities at the right cost and are used appropriately. Unfortunately, some countries like Uganda have shortage of pharmacists in public health facilities, the dominant providers of care. This study investigated the factors that affect the occupancy of pharmacist positions in Uganda's public hospitals, including hiring patterns and job attraction and retention. A cross-sectional survey of 91 registered pharmacists practicing in Uganda and desk review of records from the country's health care worker (HCW) recruiting agency was done in the months of May, June, and July, 2016. Pharmacist interviews were done using self-administered structured questionnaire and analyzed by descriptive statistics and chi-square test. Slight majority (53%) of the interviewed pharmacists work in two sectors. About 60% of the pharmacists had ever applied for public hospital jobs. Of those who received offers (N = 46), 30% had declined them. Among those who accepted the offers (N = 41), 41% had already quit. Meanwhile, the pace of hiring pharmacists into Uganda's public sector is too slow. Low socio-economic status of family in childhood (χ (2) = 2.77, p = 0.10), admission through matriculation and diploma scheme (χ (2) = 2.37, p = 0.12), internship in countryside hospitals (χ (2) = 2.24, p = 0.13), working experience before pharmacy school (χ (2) = 2.21, p = 0.14), salary expectation (χ (2) = 1.76, p = 0.18), and rural secondary education (χ (2) = 1.75, p = 0.19) favored attraction but in a statistically insignificant manner. Retention was most favored by zero postgraduate qualification (χ (2) = 4.39, p = 0.04), matriculation and diploma admission scheme (χ (2) = 2.57, p = 0.11), and working experience in private sector (χ (2) = 2.21, p = 0.14). The pace of hiring of pharmacists into Uganda's public health sector is too slow and should be stepped up. Besides work incentives, affirmative action to increase admissions into pharmacy degree training programs through matriculation and diploma schemes and for children with rural childhoods should be considered.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 20%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 4%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 36 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 11 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 6%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 36 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2017.
All research outputs
#15,739,529
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#1,040
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,435
of 421,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#18
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.