↓ Skip to main content

Oviduct: roles in fertilization and early embryo development

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Endocrinology, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
182 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
290 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oviduct: roles in fertilization and early embryo development
Published in
Journal of Endocrinology, January 2017
DOI 10.1530/joe-16-0302
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shuai Li, Wipawee Winuthayanon

Abstract

Animal oviducts and human Fallopian tubes are a part of the female reproductive tract that hosts fertilization and pre-implantation development of the embryo. With an increasing understanding of roles of the oviduct at the cellular and molecular levels, current research signifies the importance of the oviduct on naturally conceived fertilization and pre-implantation embryo development. This review highlights the physiological conditions within the oviduct during fertilization, environmental regulation, oviductal fluid composition and its role in protecting embryos and supplying nutrients. Finally, the review compares different aspects of naturally occurring fertilization and assisted reproductive technology (ART)-achieved fertilization and embryo development, giving insight into potential areas for improvement in this technology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 290 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 288 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 18%
Student > Master 46 16%
Researcher 32 11%
Student > Bachelor 30 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 8%
Other 28 10%
Unknown 81 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 56 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 22 8%
Engineering 9 3%
Other 27 9%
Unknown 95 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,499,943
of 23,852,694 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Endocrinology
#126
of 2,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,514
of 426,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Endocrinology
#3
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,852,694 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.