You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Emerging mesenchymal tumour types and biases in the era of ubiquitous sequencing
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Clinical Pathology, August 2023
|
DOI | 10.1136/jcp-2022-208684 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Emily Anne Towery, David James Papke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 106 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 24 | 23% |
India | 8 | 8% |
Spain | 4 | 4% |
Australia | 3 | 3% |
Germany | 2 | 2% |
Mexico | 2 | 2% |
South Africa | 2 | 2% |
Nigeria | 2 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Other | 15 | 14% |
Unknown | 43 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 71 | 67% |
Scientists | 19 | 18% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 12% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2024.
All research outputs
#616,256
of 25,610,986 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Pathology
#34
of 4,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,536
of 359,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Pathology
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,610,986 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.