↓ Skip to main content

MSI-H colorectal cancers preferentially retain and expand intraepithelial lymphocytes rather than peripherally derived CD8+ T cells

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
MSI-H colorectal cancers preferentially retain and expand intraepithelial lymphocytes rather than peripherally derived CD8+ T cells
Published in
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, May 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00262-008-0534-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristi Baker, William D. Foulkes, Jeremy R. Jass

Abstract

The healthy colorectal mucosa contains many resident intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) consisting of partially activated yet hyporesponsive CD8(+) T cells. A predominant feature of colorectal cancers (CRCs) characterized by high levels of microsatellite instability (MSI-H) is heavy infiltration by an intraepithelial population of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (iTILs). While it has been assumed that these iTILs originate from tumor infiltration by peripheral CD8(+) effector T cells, their origin remains unknown. In light of the phenotypic and functional differences exhibited by IELs and peripheral T cells, elucidation of the precursor population of iTILs in MSI-H CRCs could clarify the role played by these lymphocytes in tumor progression. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether MSI-H CRCs interact differently with IEL- versus peripherally-derived CD8(+) T cells. Using a Transwell assay system to mimic basolateral infiltration of tumor cells by lymphocytes, T cell migration, retention, proliferation and phenotypic alterations were investigated. Results indicate that MSI-H CRCs preferentially retain and expand IEL-derived cells to a greater degree than their microsatellite stable (MSS) counterparts. While MSI-H CRCs also retained more peripherally derived T cells, this number was considerably less than that from the IEL population. While interaction of IELs with either CRC type led to baseline lymphocyte activation, MSS CRCs induced upregulation of additional activation markers on retained IELs compared to MSI-H CRCs. These results suggest that the abundant iTILs present in MSI-H CRCs result from expansion of the preexisting mucosal IEL population and imply a limited prognostic role for iTILs in MSI-H CRC.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 33%
Researcher 3 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2013.
All research outputs
#18,339,860
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
#2,427
of 2,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,866
of 83,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
#20
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.