↓ Skip to main content

No trespassing: using a biofence to manipulate wolf movements

Overview of attention for article published in Wildlife Research, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
No trespassing: using a biofence to manipulate wolf movements
Published in
Wildlife Research, April 2013
DOI 10.1071/wr12176
Authors

David E. Ausband, Michael S. Mitchell, Sarah B. Bassing, Craig White

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 118 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 21%
Student > Master 20 17%
Other 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 22 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 50%
Environmental Science 21 17%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Psychology 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 26 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2019.
All research outputs
#16,721,208
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Research
#1,037
of 1,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,233
of 212,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Research
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.