↓ Skip to main content

B-Type Natriuretic Peptide and Prognosis in Heart Failure Patients With Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction

Overview of attention for article published in JACC, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
347 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
B-Type Natriuretic Peptide and Prognosis in Heart Failure Patients With Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction
Published in
JACC, April 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.044
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dirk J. van Veldhuisen, Gerard C.M. Linssen, Tiny Jaarsma, Wiek H. van Gilst, Arno W. Hoes, Jan G.P. Tijssen, Walter J. Paulus, Adriaan A. Voors, Hans L. Hillege

Abstract

This study sought to determine the prognostic value of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF), in comparison to data in HF patients with reduced left ventricular (LV) EF (≤40%).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 194 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 25 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 11%
Researcher 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Student > Postgraduate 18 9%
Other 46 23%
Unknown 48 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 109 54%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Chemistry 4 2%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 49 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2021.
All research outputs
#15,739,010
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#13,548
of 16,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,008
of 212,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#193
of 316 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 316 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.