↓ Skip to main content

Latino, Asian, and black segregation in U.S. metropolitan areas: Are multiethnic metros different*

Overview of attention for article published in Demography, February 1996
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
248 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
Title
Latino, Asian, and black segregation in U.S. metropolitan areas: Are multiethnic metros different*
Published in
Demography, February 1996
DOI 10.2307/2061712
Pubmed ID
Authors

William H. Frey, Reynolds Farley

Abstract

This study examines 1990 residential segregation levels and 1980-1990 changes in segregation for Latinos, Asians, and blacks in U.S. metropolitan areas. It also evaluates the effect of emerging multiethnic metropolitan area contexts for these segregation patterns. While black segregation levels are still well above those for Latinos and Asians, there is some trend toward convergence over the decade. More than half of the areas increased their Latino segregation levels over the 1980s, and almost three-fourths increased their Asian segregation levels. In contrast, black segregation levels decreased in 88% of metropolitan areas. Multiethnic metropolitan area context is shown to be important for internal segregation dynamics. Black segregation levels are lower, and were more likely to decline in multiethnic metropolitan areas and when other minority groups grew faster than blacks. Latino segregation was also more likely to decline in such areas, and declines in both Latino and Asian segregation were greater when other minority groups were growing. These findings point up the potential for greater mixed-race and mixed-ethnicity coresidence in the neighborhoods of multiethnic metropolitan areas.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Finland 1 1%
Uganda 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 92 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 30%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 13 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 63 64%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 20 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,822,886
of 25,380,192 outputs
Outputs from Demography
#1,015
of 1,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,308
of 80,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Demography
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,380,192 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,995 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.