↓ Skip to main content

Dexmedetomidine: an alternative for epidural anesthesia in tension-free vaginal-tape surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Anesthesia, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Dexmedetomidine: an alternative for epidural anesthesia in tension-free vaginal-tape surgery
Published in
Journal of Anesthesia, March 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00540-011-1113-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alparslan Turan, Hüseyin Şen, Ali Sızlan, Ömer Yanarateş, Sezai Özkan, Onur Koyuncu, Güner Dağli

Abstract

Anesthetic management of tension-free vaginal-tape (TVT) procedures is sometimes difficult to deal with, especially when surgeons request a cough test. Dexmedetomidine has unique sedative and analgesic properties while having minimal respiratory effects, making it suitable for perioperative use in monitored anesthesia care. We aimed to compare dexmedetomidine and epidural anesthesia in TVT patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 64 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Postgraduate 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Unspecified 4 6%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 20 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 40%
Unspecified 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 21 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2013.
All research outputs
#15,272,977
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Anesthesia
#414
of 803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,758
of 120,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Anesthesia
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 803 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.