↓ Skip to main content

Estimating the Number of People Who Inject Drugs, Female Sex Workers, and Men Who Have Sex with Men, Unguja Island, Zanzibar: Results and Synthesis of Multiple Methods

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Estimating the Number of People Who Inject Drugs, Female Sex Workers, and Men Who Have Sex with Men, Unguja Island, Zanzibar: Results and Synthesis of Multiple Methods
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10461-013-0517-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Farhat J. Khalid, Fatma M. Hamad, Asha A. Othman, Ahmed M. Khatib, Sophia Mohamed, Ameir Kh. Ali, Mohammed J. U. Dahoma

Abstract

To determine the number of people who inject drugs (PWID), female sex workers (FSW) and men who have sex with men (MSM) living in Unguja Island, Zanzibar in 2011/2012, we applied several, practical population size estimation methods including literature review, unique object multiplier, recapture from the 2007 survey, wisdom of the crowds and service multiplier. We synthesized findings and presented them to a panel of experts in order to determine plausible estimates for each population. The estimates adopted by a panel of experts as being most plausible were 3,000 for PWID, 3,958 for FSW and 2,157 for MSM. We learned that no one method could be concluded to be the standard for all three populations. The estimates we found, though still not perfect, are useful for the HIV programmes serving these populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 19%
Student > Master 11 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 14 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 33%
Social Sciences 12 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 14 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2019.
All research outputs
#5,766,575
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#826
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,099
of 196,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#9
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.