↓ Skip to main content

Sexual Partnering and HIV Risk among Black Men Who Have Sex with Men: New York City

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Urban Health, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Sexual Partnering and HIV Risk among Black Men Who Have Sex with Men: New York City
Published in
Journal of Urban Health, December 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11524-009-9416-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hong-Van Tieu, Christopher Murrill, Guozhen Xu, Beryl A. Koblin

Abstract

Black men who have sex with men (MSM) are disproportionately affected with HIV in the US. Limited event-specific data have been reported in Black MSM to help understand factors associated with increased risk of infection. Cross-sectional National HIV Behavioral Surveillance Study data from 503 MSM who reported > or =1 male sexual partner in the past year in New York City (NYC) were analyzed. Case-crossover analysis compared last protected and last unprotected anal intercourse (UAI). A total of 503 MSM were enrolled. Among 349 tested for HIV, 18% were positive. Black MSM (N = 117) were more likely to test HIV positive and not know their HIV-positive status than other racial/ethnic groups. Case-crossover analysis of 208 MSM found that men were more likely to engage in protected anal intercourse with a first time partner and with a partner of unknown HIV status. Although Black MSM were more likely to have Black male partners, they were not more likely to have UAI with those partners or to have a partner aged >40 years. In conclusion, HIV prevalence was high among Black MSM in NYC, as was lack of awareness of HIV-positive status. Having a sexual partner of same race/ethnicity or older age was not associated with having UAI among Black MSM.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 5%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 52 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 25%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Other 3 5%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 8 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 14 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 25%
Psychology 6 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 10 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2013.
All research outputs
#15,272,977
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Urban Health
#1,100
of 1,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,424
of 164,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Urban Health
#11
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,282 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.