↓ Skip to main content

Evidence and Implications of Recent Climate Change in Northern Alaska and Other Arctic Regions

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
13 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
1156 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1368 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence and Implications of Recent Climate Change in Northern Alaska and Other Arctic Regions
Published in
Climatic Change, October 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10584-005-5352-2
Authors

Larry D. Hinzman, Neil D. Bettez, W. Robert Bolton, F. Stuart Chapin, Mark B. Dyurgerov, Chris L. Fastie, Brad Griffith, Robert D. Hollister, Allen Hope, Henry P. Huntington, Anne M. Jensen, Gensuo J. Jia, Torre Jorgenson, Douglas L. Kane, David R. Klein, Gary Kofinas, Amanda H. Lynch, Andrea H. Lloyd, A. David McGuire, Frederick E. Nelson, Walter C. Oechel, Thomas E. Osterkamp, Charles H. Racine, Vladimir E. Romanovsky, Robert S. Stone, Douglas A. Stow, Matthew Sturm, Craig E. Tweedie, George L. Vourlitis, Marilyn D. Walker, Donald A. Walker, Patrick J. Webber, Jeffrey M. Welker, Kevin S. Winker, Kenji Yoshikawa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,368 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 37 3%
Canada 17 1%
United Kingdom 7 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Russia 2 <1%
Poland 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Other 15 1%
Unknown 1278 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 286 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 283 21%
Researcher 254 19%
Student > Bachelor 142 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 55 4%
Other 192 14%
Unknown 156 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 387 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 309 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 281 21%
Social Sciences 59 4%
Engineering 42 3%
Other 83 6%
Unknown 207 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,131,136
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#593
of 6,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,533
of 73,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#2
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,076 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 73,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.