↓ Skip to main content

Predicting risk of substantial weight gain in German adults—a multi-center cohort approach

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Public Health, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predicting risk of substantial weight gain in German adults—a multi-center cohort approach
Published in
European Journal of Public Health, December 2016
DOI 10.1093/eurpub/ckw216
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ursula Bachlechner, Heiner Boeing, Marjolein Haftenberger, Anja Schienkiewitz, Christa Scheidt-Nave, Susanne Vogt, Barbara Thorand, Annette Peters, Sabine Schipf, Till Ittermann, Henry Völzke, Ute Nöthlings, Jasmine Neamat-Allah, Karin-Halina Greiser, Rudolf Kaaks, Annika Steffen

Abstract

A risk-targeted prevention strategy may efficiently utilize limited resources available for prevention of overweight and obesity. Likewise, more efficient intervention trials could be designed if selection of subjects was based on risk. The aim of the study was to develop a risk score predicting substantial weight gain among German adults. We developed the risk score using information on 15 socio-demographic, dietary and lifestyle factors from 32 204 participants of five population-based German cohort studies. Substantial weight gain was defined as gaining ≥10% of weight between baseline and follow-up (>6 years apart). The cases were censored according to the theoretical point in time when the threshold of 10% baseline-based weight gain was crossed assuming linearity of weight gain. Beta coefficients derived from proportional hazards regression were used as weights to compute the risk score as a linear combination of the predictors. Cross-validation was used to evaluate the score's discriminatory accuracy. The cross-validated c index (95% CI) was 0.71 (0.67-0.75). A cutoff value of ≥475 score points yielded a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 63%. The corresponding positive and negative predictive values were 10.4% and 97.6%, respectively. The proposed risk score may support healthcare providers in decision making and referral and facilitate an efficient selection of subjects into intervention trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 10 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 7%
Psychology 2 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 13 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2017.
All research outputs
#3,836,809
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Public Health
#808
of 3,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,346
of 422,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Public Health
#8
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.