↓ Skip to main content

History of depression and risk of hyperemesis gravidarum: a population-based cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Women's Mental Health, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
Title
History of depression and risk of hyperemesis gravidarum: a population-based cohort study
Published in
Archives of Women's Mental Health, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00737-016-0713-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helena Kames Kjeldgaard, Malin Eberhard-Gran, Jūratė Šaltytė Benth, Hedvig Nordeng, Åse Vigdis Vikanes

Abstract

Hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) is a pregnancy condition characterised by debilitating nausea and vomiting. HG has been associated with depression during pregnancy but the direction of the association remains unclear. The aim of this study was to assess whether previous depression is associated with HG. This is a population-based pregnancy cohort study using data from The Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study. The study reviewed 731 pregnancies with HG and 81,055 pregnancies without. Logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the association between a lifetime history of depression and hyperemesis gravidarum. Odds ratios were adjusted for symptoms of current depression, maternal age, parity, body mass index, smoking, sex of the child, education and pelvic girdle pain. A lifetime history of depression was associated with higher odds for hyperemesis gravidarum (aOR = 1.49, 95% CI (1.23; 1.79)). Two thirds of women with hyperemesis gravidarum had neither a history of depression nor symptoms of current depression, and 1.2% of women with a history of depression developed HG. A lifetime history of depression increased the risk of HG. However, given the fact that only 1.2% of women with a history of depression developed HG and that the majority of women with HG had no symptoms of depression, depression does not seem to be a main driver in the aetiology of HG.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 123 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 16%
Student > Master 18 15%
Researcher 7 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 3%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 58 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 15%
Psychology 8 7%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 59 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,959,280
of 22,931,367 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Women's Mental Health
#196
of 926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,408
of 420,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Women's Mental Health
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,931,367 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.