| Title |
Sepsis as a cause and consequence of acute kidney injury: Program to Improve Care in Acute Renal Disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-010-2089-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ravindra L. Mehta, Josée Bouchard, Sharon B. Soroko, T. Alp Ikizler, Emil P. Paganini, Glenn M. Chertow, Jonathan Himmelfarb, Program to Improve Care in Acute Renal Disease (PICARD) Study Group |
| Abstract |
Sepsis commonly contributes to acute kidney injury (AKI); however, the frequency with which sepsis develops as a complication of AKI and the clinical consequences of this sepsis are unknown. This study examined the incidence of, and outcomes associated with, sepsis developing after AKI. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Belgium | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 202 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 24 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 9% |
| Researcher | 18 | 9% |
| Other | 66 | 31% |
| Unknown | 40 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 120 | 57% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 9% |
| Unknown | 40 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2013.
All research outputs
#4,495,937
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,207
of 4,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,725
of 180,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#8
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,970 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.