↓ Skip to main content

Comparative mapping in grasses. Oat relationships

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Genetics and Genomics, May 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Comparative mapping in grasses. Oat relationships
Published in
Molecular Genetics and Genomics, May 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf00290536
Pubmed ID
Authors

Allen E. Van Deynze, James C. Nelson, Louise S. O'Donoughue, Sang Nag Ahn, Wilawan Siripoonwiwat, Sandra E. Harrington, Eliana S. Yglesias, Daniella P. Braga, Susan R. McCouch, Mark E. Sorrells

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 42%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2017.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Genetics and Genomics
#2,974
of 3,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,579
of 23,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Genetics and Genomics
#13
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,318 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 23,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.