↓ Skip to main content

Visual Methods and Sociological Imagination

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Sociological Review / Shakaigaku Hyoron, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Visual Methods and Sociological Imagination
Published in
Japanese Sociological Review / Shakaigaku Hyoron, January 2009
DOI 10.4057/jsr.60.40
Authors

Noriaki Goto

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 1%
Unknown 82 99%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 1 1%
Unknown 82 99%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2013.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Sociological Review / Shakaigaku Hyoron
#617
of 661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,647
of 183,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Sociological Review / Shakaigaku Hyoron
#16
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 661 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.