↓ Skip to main content

Neo-extractivism and the Resource Curse Hypothesis: Evidence from Ecuador

Overview of attention for article published in Development, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Neo-extractivism and the Resource Curse Hypothesis: Evidence from Ecuador
Published in
Development, January 2017
DOI 10.1057/s41301-016-0053-x
Authors

Andrea Cori, Salvatore Monni

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 13 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 10 25%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 15%
Environmental Science 5 13%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 12 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2022.
All research outputs
#5,927,647
of 23,952,301 outputs
Outputs from Development
#148
of 466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,253
of 426,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Development
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,952,301 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.