↓ Skip to main content

In vivo efficacy of a biotherapic and eugenol formulation against Rhipicephalus microplus

Overview of attention for article published in Parasitology Research, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
In vivo efficacy of a biotherapic and eugenol formulation against Rhipicephalus microplus
Published in
Parasitology Research, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00436-016-5366-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paula Pimentel Valente, Gustavo Henrique Ferreira Abreu Moreira, Matheus Ferreira Serafini, Elias Jorge Facury-Filho, Antônio Último Carvalho, André Augusto Gomes Faraco, Rachel Oliveira Castilho, Múcio Flávio Barbosa Ribeiro

Abstract

The control of Rhipicephalus microplus is essential to prevent cattle discomfort and economic losses. However, increased resistance and acaricides inefficiency lead producers to adopt strategies that could result in the accumulation of chemical residues in meat and milk with possibilities of poisoning in animals and people. This scenario demonstrates the necessity of research into the identification of novel, effective and environmentally safe therapeutic options for cattle tick control. The objectives of this study were to develop and assess the efficacy of R. microplus biotherapic and of 5% eugenol for the control of R. microplus in artificially infested calves. Eighteen male 6-month-old Holstein calves were divided into three groups of six animals. In Group 1, the animals did not receive medication (control group); in Group 2, the animals received 1 mL of R. microplus biotherapic at dilution 6CH (centesimal Hahnemannian), orally administered twice daily. And in Group 3, they received a single application of eugenol 5% in the pour-on formulation. The median efficacy for biotherapy and eugenol 5% was respectively 10.13 and 13.97%; however, upon analyzing reproductive efficiency, it is noteworthy that the biotherapic had 45.86% efficiency and was superior to the action of eugenol (12.03%) after 37 days of treatment. The ultrastructural study provided information about the effects of R. microplus biotherapic on the ovaries of engorged females and showed disorganization in the deposition of the oocyte exochorion. The results suggest hatchability inhibition of larvae, interference in R. microplus reproduction and future possibilities for eco-friendly control of R. microplus with biotherapic 6CH.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 8 15%
Student > Master 7 13%
Professor 5 9%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 16 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 21 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2017.
All research outputs
#2,808,871
of 24,167,226 outputs
Outputs from Parasitology Research
#120
of 3,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,171
of 428,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasitology Research
#4
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,167,226 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,899 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.