↓ Skip to main content

Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias

Overview of attention for article published in Consciousness & Cognition, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 1,722)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
57 news outlets
blogs
17 blogs
twitter
37 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
661 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
788 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias
Published in
Consciousness & Cognition, May 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.concog.2013.04.016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tabitha C. Peck, Sofia Seinfeld, Salvatore M. Aglioti, Mel Slater

Abstract

Although it has been shown that immersive virtual reality (IVR) can be used to induce illusions of ownership over a virtual body (VB), information on whether this changes implicit interpersonal attitudes is meager. Here we demonstrate that embodiment of light-skinned participants in a dark-skinned VB significantly reduced implicit racial bias against dark-skinned people, in contrast to embodiment in light-skinned, purple-skinned or with no VB. 60 females participated in this between-groups experiment, with a VB substituting their own, with full-body visuomotor synchrony, reflected also in a virtual mirror. A racial Implicit Association Test (IAT) was administered at least three days prior to the experiment, and immediately after the IVR exposure. The change from pre- to post-experience IAT scores suggests that the dark-skinned embodied condition decreased implicit racial bias more than the other conditions. Thus, embodiment may change negative interpersonal attitudes and thus represent a powerful tool for exploring such fundamental psychological and societal phenomena.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 788 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 769 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 151 19%
Student > Master 117 15%
Student > Bachelor 106 13%
Researcher 94 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 53 7%
Other 120 15%
Unknown 147 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 253 32%
Computer Science 104 13%
Social Sciences 60 8%
Neuroscience 50 6%
Engineering 27 3%
Other 118 15%
Unknown 176 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 626. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2024.
All research outputs
#36,035
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Consciousness & Cognition
#5
of 1,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164
of 210,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Consciousness & Cognition
#1
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,722 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.