↓ Skip to main content

Food Insecurity Increases HIV Risk Among Young Sex Workers in Metro Vancouver, Canada

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Food Insecurity Increases HIV Risk Among Young Sex Workers in Metro Vancouver, Canada
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10461-016-1558-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniella Barreto, Kate Shannon, Chrissy Taylor, Sabina Dobrer, Jessica St. Jean, Shira M. Goldenberg, Putu Duff, Kathleen N. Deering

Abstract

This research aimed to determine the effect of food insecurity on sexual HIV risk with clients among youth sex workers (YSWs) <30 years in Metro Vancouver, Canada. Data were drawn from a prospective community cohort of sex workers (2010-2013). We examined the independent relationship between YSWs' food insecurity and being pressured into sex without a condom by clients ("client condom refusal"). Of 220 YSWs, 34.5 % (n = 76) reported client condom refusal over the 3.5-year study period and 76.4 % (n = 168) reported any food insecurity. Adjusting for other HIV risk pathways, food insecurity retained an independent effect on client condom refusal (AOR 2.08, 95 % CI 1.23-3.51), suggesting that food insecurity is significantly associated with HIV risk among YSWs. This study indicates a critical relationship between food insecurity and HIV risk, and demonstrates YSWs' particular vulnerability. Public policies for food assistance as a harm reduction measure may be key to addressing this disparity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 20%
Student > Bachelor 12 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Researcher 6 8%
Other 4 6%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 19 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 14%
Social Sciences 9 13%
Psychology 5 7%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 21 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2017.
All research outputs
#3,456,859
of 25,848,962 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#491
of 3,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,995
of 324,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#10
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,848,962 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.