↓ Skip to main content

But there are no QOF points for Balint work!: Its place in modern practice

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
But there are no QOF points for Balint work!: Its place in modern practice
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, November 2010
DOI 10.3399/bjgp10x539380
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dan Edgcumbe

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 30%
Librarian 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Student > Postgraduate 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 50%
Social Sciences 2 20%
Arts and Humanities 1 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2018.
All research outputs
#17,812,737
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#3,664
of 4,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,831
of 100,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#16
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.