↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Quinoa Seeds (Chenopodium quinoa) in Diet on some Biochemical Parameters and Essential Elements in Blood of High Fructose-Fed Rats

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 748)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
6 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
Title
Effect of Quinoa Seeds (Chenopodium quinoa) in Diet on some Biochemical Parameters and Essential Elements in Blood of High Fructose-Fed Rats
Published in
Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, November 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11130-010-0197-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paweł Paśko, Paweł Zagrodzki, Henryk Bartoń, Joanna Chłopicka, Shela Gorinstein

Abstract

The effect of Chenopodium quinoa seeds on lipid profile, glucose level, protein metabolism and selected essential elements (Na, K, Ca, Mg) level was determined in high-fructose fed male Wistar rats. Fructose decreased significantly LDL [42%, p<0.01] and activity of alkaline phosphatase [20%, p<0.05], and increased triglycerides level [86%, p<0.01]. The analysis of blood of rats fed quinoa indicated, that these seeds effectively reduced serum total cholesterol [26%, p<0.05], LDL [57%, p<0.008] and triglycerides [11%, p<0.05] when compared to the control group. Quinoa seeds also significantly reduced the level of glucose [10%, p<0.01] and plasma total protein level [16%, p<0.001]. Fructose significantly decreased HDL [15%, p<0.05] level in control group but when the quinoa seeds were added into the diet the decrease of HDL level was inhibited. Quinoa seeds did not prevent any adverse effect of increasing triglyceride level caused by fructose. It was shown in this study that quinoa seeds can reduce most of the adverse effects exerted by fructose on lipid profile and glucose level.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 115 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Professor 9 8%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 27 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 35%
Engineering 10 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 34 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2024.
All research outputs
#701,970
of 25,381,783 outputs
Outputs from Plant Foods for Human Nutrition
#18
of 748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,901
of 191,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Foods for Human Nutrition
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,381,783 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 748 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them