↓ Skip to main content

Identity concept learning in matching-to-sample tasks by tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella)

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Identity concept learning in matching-to-sample tasks by tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella)
Published in
Animal Cognition, June 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10071-010-0332-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valentina Truppa, Duilio Garofoli, Giulia Castorina, Eva Piano Mortari, Francesco Natale, Elisabetta Visalberghi

Abstract

The abstract concept of equivalence is considered one of the bases of higher-order cognition, and it has been the subject of considerable research in comparative cognition. This study examined the conditions under which tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) are able to acquire an identity concept. Six capuchin monkeys were trained to solve a visual matching-to-sample (MTS) task on the basis of perceptual identity. The acquisition of the identity rule was inferred from the subject's ability to solve transfer tests with novel stimuli. We evaluated the ability of the capuchin monkeys to match the shape of novel stimuli after training with both several small stimulus sets (Experiment 1) and a large stimulus set (Experiment 2). Moreover, we examined the ability of capuchins to transfer the concept to novel visual dimensions, such as colour and size and to transfer to novel spatial arrangements of the stimuli (Experiment 2). We demonstrated that the ability of capuchins to match novel stimuli was improved by increasing the number of stimuli used during training (Experiments 1 and 2) and that after a widely applicable identity concept based on the stimulus shape was acquired, the capuchins were able to match stimuli according to an identity rule based on both the colour and size of the stimuli and when the spatial arrangement of the stimuli was varied (Experiment 2). This study is the first to demonstrate that the size of the training set affects the acquisition of an abstract identity concept in an MTS task in non-human primates.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Sweden 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 73 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 5 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 28 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 28%
Neuroscience 8 10%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 5 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2013.
All research outputs
#15,272,977
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#1,220
of 1,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,939
of 93,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#11
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.