↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Pitfalls in machine learning‐based assessment of tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer: A report of the International Immuno‐Oncology Biomarker Working Group on Breast Cancer
Published in
The Journal of Pathology, August 2023
DOI 10.1002/path.6155
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeppe Thagaard, Glenn Broeckx, David B Page, Chowdhury Arif Jahangir, Sara Verbandt, Zuzana Kos, Rajarsi Gupta, Reena Khiroya, Khalid Abduljabbar, Gabriela Acosta Haab, Balazs Acs, Guray Akturk, Jonas S Almeida, Isabel Alvarado‐Cabrero, Mohamed Amgad, Farid Azmoudeh‐Ardalan, Sunil Badve, Nurkhairul Bariyah Baharun, Eva Balslev, Enrique R Bellolio, Vydehi Bheemaraju, Kim RM Blenman, Luciana Botinelly Mendonça Fujimoto, Najat Bouchmaa, Octavio Burgues, Alexandros Chardas, Maggie Chon U Cheang, Francesco Ciompi, Lee AD Cooper, An Coosemans, Germán Corredor, Anders B Dahl, Flavio Luis Dantas Portela, Frederik Deman, Sandra Demaria, Johan Doré Hansen, Sarah N Dudgeon, Thomas Ebstrup, Mahmoud Elghazawy, Claudio Fernandez‐Martín, Stephen B Fox, William M Gallagher, Jennifer M Giltnane, Sacha Gnjatic, Paula I Gonzalez‐Ericsson, Anita Grigoriadis, Niels Halama, Matthew G Hanna, Aparna Harbhajanka, Steven N Hart, Johan Hartman, Søren Hauberg, Stephen Hewitt, Akira I Hida, Hugo M Horlings, Zaheed Husain, Evangelos Hytopoulos, Sheeba Irshad, Emiel AM Janssen, Mohamed Kahila, Tatsuki R Kataoka, Kosuke Kawaguchi, Durga Kharidehal, Andrey I Khramtsov, Umay Kiraz, Pawan Kirtani, Liudmila L Kodach, Konstanty Korski, Anikó Kovács, Anne‐Vibeke Laenkholm, Corinna Lang‐Schwarz, Denis Larsimont, Jochen K Lennerz, Marvin Lerousseau, Xiaoxian Li, Amy Ly, Anant Madabhushi, Sai K Maley, Vidya Manur Narasimhamurthy, Douglas K Marks, Elizabeth S McDonald, Ravi Mehrotra, Stefan Michiels, Fayyaz ul Amir Afsar Minhas, Shachi Mittal, David A Moore, Shamim Mushtaq, Hussain Nighat, Thomas Papathomas, Frederique Penault‐Llorca, Rashindrie D Perera, Christopher J Pinard, Juan Carlos Pinto‐Cardenas, Giancarlo Pruneri, Lajos Pusztai, Arman Rahman, Nasir Mahmood Rajpoot, Bernardo Leon Rapoport, Tilman T Rau, Jorge S Reis‐Filho, Joana M Ribeiro, David Rimm, Anne Roslind, Anne Vincent‐Salomon, Manuel Salto‐Tellez, Joel Saltz, Shahin Sayed, Ely Scott, Kalliopi P Siziopikou, Christos Sotiriou, Albrecht Stenzinger, Maher A Sughayer, Daniel Sur, Susan Fineberg, Fraser Symmans, Sunao Tanaka, Timothy Taxter, Sabine Tejpar, Jonas Teuwen, E Aubrey Thompson, Trine Tramm, William T Tran, Jeroen van der Laak, Paul J van Diest, Gregory E Verghese, Giuseppe Viale, Michael Vieth, Noorul Wahab, Thomas Walter, Yannick Waumans, Hannah Y Wen, Wentao Yang, Yinyin Yuan, Reena Md Zin, Sylvia Adams, John Bartlett, Sibylle Loibl, Carsten Denkert, Peter Savas, Sherene Loi, Roberto Salgado, Elisabeth Specht Stovgaard

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 118 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Researcher 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 5 4%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 68 58%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 71 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2025.
All research outputs
#4,030,980
of 27,925,463 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Pathology
#365
of 3,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,795
of 370,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Pathology
#9
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,925,463 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.