| Title |
Delayed genetic effects of habitat fragmentation on the ecologically specialized Florida sand skink (Plestiodon reynoldsi)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, September 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-008-9707-x |
| Authors |
Jonathan Q. Richmond, Duncan T. Reid, Kyle G. Ashton, Kelly R. Zamudio |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 8% |
| Portugal | 3 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Guatemala | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 21% |
| Unknown | 7 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 57 | 66% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 11 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2017.
All research outputs
#6,185,807
of 22,931,367 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#379
of 1,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,685
of 88,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,931,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.