↓ Skip to main content

The Molecular Basis for the Lack of Immunostimulatory Activity of Vertebrate DNA

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Immunology, April 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
156 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Molecular Basis for the Lack of Immunostimulatory Activity of Vertebrate DNA
Published in
The Journal of Immunology, April 2003
DOI 10.4049/jimmunol.170.7.3614
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katryn J. Stacey, Greg R. Young, Francis Clark, David P. Sester, Tara L. Roberts, Shalin Naik, Matthew J. Sweet, David A. Hume

Abstract

Macrophages and B cells are activated by unmethylated CpG-containing sequences in bacterial DNA. The lack of activity of self DNA has generally been attributed to CpG suppression and methylation, although the role of methylation is in doubt. The frequency of CpG in the mouse genome is 12.5% of Escherichia coli, with unmethylated CpG occurring at approximately 3% the frequency of E. coli. This suppression of CpG alone is insufficient to explain the inactivity of self DNA; vertebrate DNA was inactive at 100 micro g/ml, 3000 times the concentration at which E. coli DNA activity was observed. We sought to resolve why self DNA does not activate macrophages. Known active CpG motifs occurred in the mouse genome at 18% of random occurrence, similar to general CpG suppression. To examine the contribution of methylation, genomic DNAs were PCR amplified. Removal of methylation from the mouse genome revealed activity that was 23-fold lower than E. coli DNA, although there is only a 7-fold lower frequency of known active CpG motifs in the mouse genome. This discrepancy may be explained by G-rich sequences such as GGAGGGG, which potently inhibited activation and are found in greater frequency in the mouse than the E. coli genome. In summary, general CpG suppression, CpG methylation, inhibitory motifs, and saturable DNA uptake combined to explain the inactivity of self DNA. The immunostimulatory activity of DNA is determined by the frequency of unmethylated stimulatory sequences within an individual DNA strand and the ratio of stimulatory to inhibitory sequences.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 62 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 30%
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Master 7 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 9 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 10%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 10 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2013.
All research outputs
#7,508,670
of 22,931,367 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Immunology
#9,124
of 25,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,203
of 51,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Immunology
#121
of 252 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,931,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 51,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 252 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.