↓ Skip to main content

Outcomes of multiple myeloma patients receiving bortezomib, lenalidomide, and carfilzomib

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Hematology, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Outcomes of multiple myeloma patients receiving bortezomib, lenalidomide, and carfilzomib
Published in
Annals of Hematology, December 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00277-016-2889-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ariana Berenson, Suzie Vardanyan, Michael David, James Wang, Nika Manik Harutyunyan, Jillian Gottlieb, Ran Halleluyan, Tanya M. Spektor, Kyle A. Udd, Shahrooz Eshaghian, Youram Nassir, Benjamin Eades, Regina Swift, James R. Berenson

Abstract

New classes of drugs including the proteasome inhibitors (PI) bortezomib and, more recently, carfilzomib and the immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide have shown improved outcomes for multiple myeloma (MM) patients during the past decade. However, most of the studies reporting outcomes for patients receiving these drugs have relied on older data sets derived from large institutions that included patients not receiving their treatment at those facilities and represented only those eligible for clinical trials or were from sites where treatment options were limited. We have analyzed data from 258 MM patients who have received treatment with at least one of three agents: bortezomib, carfilzomib, and lenalidomide in a single clinic specializing in MM with respect to their responses and other outcomes to treatment regimens including these agents. Response rates were similar between these three drugs when used for the first time and again during subsequent treatment regimens. As expected, the clinical benefit rates (CBRs) were better for patients receiving their first treatment when compared to their use in subsequent treatment regimens. The CBRs were similar during their 2nd, 3rd, and 4th treatments containing these agents. Many patients refractory to these agents showed responses to regimens containing these same drugs when used in different combinations. In addition, patients refractory to one PI often responded to the other PI. The results of this study demonstrate that novel agents can be used repeatedly in novel combinations with significant clinical benefit for patients with MM.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 19%
Other 4 15%
Student > Postgraduate 4 15%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 52%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 3 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2018.
All research outputs
#2,419,039
of 22,931,367 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Hematology
#68
of 2,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,764
of 419,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Hematology
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,931,367 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,187 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.