| Title |
The Importance of Standardization on Analyzing Circulating RNA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40291-016-0251-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Inyoul Lee, David Baxter, Min Young Lee, Kelsey Scherler, Kai Wang |
| Abstract |
Circulating RNAs, especially microRNAs (miRNAs), have recently emerged as non-invasive disease biomarkers. Despite enthusiasm and numerous reports on disease-associated circulating miRNAs, currently there is no circulating miRNA-based diagnostic in use. In addition, there are many contradictory reports on the concentration changes of specific miRNA in circulation. Here we review the impact of various technical and non-technical factors related to circulating miRNA measurement and elucidate the importance of having a general guideline for sample preparation and concentration measurement in studying circulating RNA. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 33% |
| France | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 24% |
| Researcher | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 20 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 24 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2022.
All research outputs
#4,530,058
of 24,891,087 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy
#57
of 421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,840
of 432,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,891,087 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 421 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.