Simulating and reporting frequentist operating characteristics of clinical trials that borrow external information: Towards a fair comparison in case of one‐arm and hybrid control two‐arm trials
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,329,417
of 25,726,194 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Statistics
#208
of 590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,659
of 357,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Statistics
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,726,194 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 590 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.
