You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A tailored, supportive care intervention using systematic assessment designed for people with inoperable lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psycho-Oncology, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/pon.3306 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Penelope Schofield, Anna Ugalde, Karla Gough, John Reece, Meinir Krishnasamy, Mariko Carey, David Ball, Sanchia Aranda |
| Abstract |
People with inoperable lung cancer experience higher levels of distress, more unmet needs and symptoms than other cancer patients. There is an urgent need to test innovative approaches to improve psychosocial and symptom outcomes in this group. This study tested the hypothesis that a tailored, multidisciplinary supportive care programme based on systematic needs assessment would reduce perceived unmet needs and distress and improve quality of life. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 148 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 16% |
| Researcher | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Unknown | 38 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 24% |
| Psychology | 25 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 44 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2013.
All research outputs
#8,309,481
of 24,858,211 outputs
Outputs from Psycho-Oncology
#1,130
of 2,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,660
of 202,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psycho-Oncology
#10
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,858,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.