| Title |
Guidelines for clinical electroretinography in the dog: 2012 update
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Documenta Ophthalmologica, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10633-013-9388-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Björn Ekesten, András M. Komáromy, Ron Ofri, Simon M. Petersen-Jones, Kristina Narfström |
| Abstract |
The full-field, flash electroretinogram (ERG) is now a widely used test of canine retinal function for the clinical diagnosis of hereditary retinal dystrophies and other causes of retinal degeneration, assessment of retinal function in patients with opaque media, ruling out of generalized retinal diseases in patients with sudden loss of vision and in ophthalmological research, as well as in pharmaceutical and toxicological screening for deleterious side effects of drugs and other chemical compounds. In 2002, the first guidelines for clinical ERGs in this species adopted by the European College of Veterinary Ophthalmologists were published. This work provides an update of these guidelines. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Tunisia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 99 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 10% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 24 | 24% |
| Unknown | 24 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 48 | 47% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 22 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2013.
All research outputs
#20,194,368
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from Documenta Ophthalmologica
#366
of 456 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,229
of 194,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Documenta Ophthalmologica
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 456 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them