| Title |
Leaf-level plasticity of Salix gordejevii in fixed dunes compared with lowlands in Hunshandake Sandland, North China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Plant Research, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10265-009-0249-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hua Su, Yonggeng Li, Zhenjiang Lan, Hong Xu, Wei Liu, Bingxue Wang, Dilip Kumar Biswas, Gaoming Jiang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 33 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 23% |
| Researcher | 7 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 20% |
| Unknown | 5 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 11% |
| Engineering | 3 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#7,508,670
of 22,931,367 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Plant Research
#196
of 833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,552
of 111,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Plant Research
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,931,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 833 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.