↓ Skip to main content

A destructive arthropathy following Chikungunya virus arthritis — a possible association

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Rheumatology, June 1984
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
A destructive arthropathy following Chikungunya virus arthritis — a possible association
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology, June 1984
DOI 10.1007/bf02030766
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. W. Brighton, I. W. Simson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 21%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Professor 3 8%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 9 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 6 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,508,670
of 22,931,367 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#1,152
of 3,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,485
of 9,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,931,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them