↓ Skip to main content

A pilot cadaveric study of temperature and adjacent tissue changes after exposure of magnetic-controlled growing rods to MRI

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
A pilot cadaveric study of temperature and adjacent tissue changes after exposure of magnetic-controlled growing rods to MRI
Published in
European Spine Journal, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00586-016-4918-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Selina Poon, Ryan Nixon, Stephen Wendolowski, Rachel Gecelter, Yen Hsun Chen, Jon-Paul DiMauro, Terry Amaral, Adam Graver, Daniel A. Grande

Abstract

To test for possible thermal injury and tissue damage caused by magnetic-controlled growing rods (MCGRs) during MRI scans. Three fresh frozen cadavers were utilized. Four MRI scans were performed: baseline, after spinal hardware implantation, and twice after MCGR implantation. Cross connectors were placed at the proximal end and at the distal end of the construct, making a complete circuit hinged at those two points. Three points were identified as potential sites for significant heating: adjacent to the proximal and distal cross connectors and adjacent to the actuators. Data collected included tissue temperatures at baseline (R1), after screw insertion (R2), and twice after rod insertions (R3 and R4). Tissue samples were taken and stained for signs of heat damage. There was a slight change in tissue temperature in the regions next to the implants between baseline and after each scan. Average temperatures (°C) increased by 0.94 (0.16-1.63) between R1 and R2, 1.6 (1.23-1.97) between R2 and R3, and 0.39 (0.03-0.83) between R3 and R4. Subsequent histological analysis revealed no signs of heat induced damage. Recurrent MRI scans of patients with MCGRs may be necessary over the course of treatment. When implanted into human cadaveric tissue, these rods appear to not be a risk to the patient with respect to heating or tissue damage. Further in vivo study is warranted. N/A.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 6 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 8 33%