↓ Skip to main content

Developmental Markers of Genetic Liability to Autism in Parents: A Longitudinal, Multigenerational Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
Title
Developmental Markers of Genetic Liability to Autism in Parents: A Longitudinal, Multigenerational Study
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10803-016-2996-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Molly Losh, Gary E. Martin, Michelle Lee, Jessica Klusek, John Sideris, Sheila Barron, Thomas Wassink

Abstract

Genetic liability to autism spectrum disorder (ASD) can be expressed in unaffected relatives through subclinical, genetically meaningful traits, or endophenotypes. This study aimed to identify developmental endophenotypes in parents of individuals with ASD by examining parents' childhood academic development over the school-age period. A cohort of 139 parents of individuals with ASD were studied, along with their children with ASD and 28 controls. Parents' childhood records in the domains of language, reading, and math were studied from grades K-12. Results indicated that relatively lower performance and slower development of skills (particularly language related skills), and an uneven rate of development across domains predicted ASD endophenotypes in adulthood for parents, and the severity of clinical symptoms in children with ASD. These findings may mark childhood indicators of genetic liability to ASD in parents, that could inform understanding of the subclinical expression of ASD genetic liability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 107 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 15%
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 29 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 35 32%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Linguistics 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 39 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,496,932
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2,619
of 5,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,764
of 425,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#38
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.